Would someone maybe explain this situation following a job injury

These topics felt less like ordinary claim steps and more like figuring out what triggered a change. My first question would be which notice triggered the problem. I found it easier to treat the denial reason, the IME report, and the next move in different columns, because the next move should follow the disputed record. That is where I would go back to the actual record a treatment request is rejected. I would not use one IME problem as a sign that there is no next step, because the record may show a separate medical question. The practical move was naming the problem before choosing the next step. For the issue I wanted kept separate, I saved the Comp Claim Helper guide with the claim-problem notes. The whole issue felt less like one huge fight and more like something to verify.

 

scammer!!