Not sure who wrote this but I believe it encapsulates what many of us women are thinking. This morning, think about this: regardless of your political affiliation: I could, right now, call out ANY man that I knew 44 years ago in high school, by name, and tell you a story that paints a horrible picture of him. It won't matter if the story is real or if it's made up. And more than half of the comments I'd receive would be how sorry folks are for me, hope I am okay and pray he gets his due. THAT is what is wrong with the Brett Kavanaugh situation - and I don't care about your party affiliation...you all have a man you love - a father, a grandfather, a brother, a son, a nephew, an uncle, a grandson, a boyfriend, a fiance, a friend ---- we are headed down a very scary road if words, only words, with NO PROOF, can ruin a man. Get on the right side of this: It's so beyond politics. Do we want to live in a country where we can ruin a life by speaking whatever we want and we are believed simply because we are female? I do not. (As a favor - SHARE THIS IF YOU AGREE. I really want people to start looking at this in a very personal way. It's not politics anymore. People are ruining lives. Turn the tables and imagine if this were your family!) WPT … (YAC) … Note : This was written by a Lady …
Ever wonder why Trump calls them 'The Deep State'? This is a very meticulous breakdown of just how deep 'The Deep State' is. It is a virtual can-of-worms where the Washington bureaucrats are so inter-connected to one another that they do control how the country is run and by whom. This is a good flow-chart of 'The Swamp'. No wonder they are going after Trump. He is threatening their very existence. Let's follow the trail...... Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been empanelled. Governments from around the world had donated to the "Charity." Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those millions in "Donations" to the Clinton Foundation were declared. Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out. Guess who took over this investigation in 2002? None other than James Comey. Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? Your friend and mine, Lois "Be on The Look Out" (BOLO) Lerner. It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right? Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005? No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein. Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame? I know, it's a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, but it was Robert Mueller.. What do all four casting characters have in common? They ALL were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation. Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance. Let's fast forward to 2009...... James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way. The Uranium One "issue" comes to the attention of the Hillary. Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America's best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to none other than, the Russians. Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn't, the People of America got absolutely nothing out of it. However, prior to the sale approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid $500K (that's $500,000.00) for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours. Ok, no big deal right? Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside one of the companies in the Uranium One deal who was informing them on vast money laundering and bribery taking place to get the Uranium One deal approved. Guess who was the FBI Director during this time frame? Yep, Robert Mueller. He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009. Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney's Office in Maryland? None other than, Rod Rosenstein. Guess what happened to the informant? The Department of Justice placed a gag order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it. How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America (Uranium) end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole, providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise? Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved? $145 million dollars in "donations" made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal. Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, Lois Lerner.. Ok, that's all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right? Let's fast forward to 2015. Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the nine "investigations" the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy (wish we had more Trey Gowdys) who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her "Public Service" as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email. Sparing you the State Department's cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the John Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this.. they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary. Now, this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? None other than James Comey. Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh? Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the "Clinton E-mail Investigation" after, of course, his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner "matter" at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her. Nope.... couldn't find any crimes there. Can you guess what happened next? In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy. They didn't even convene a Grand Jury. Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true "gangsta homey" he is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July 8th 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing. Can you see the pattern? It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues. FISA abuse, political espionage..... pick a crime, any crime, chances are....... this group and a few others did it. All the same players. All compromised and conflicted. All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves. All connected in one way or another to the Clintons. They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch. How many lives have these two destroyed? As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes. And..... See the person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton. WHO IS LISA BARSOOMIAN? Let's learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian's background. Lisa H. Barsoomian, a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a confidant of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998. Lawrence also represented: Robert Mueller three times; James Comey five times; Barack Obama 45 times; Kathleen Sebelius 56 times; Bill Clinton 40 times; and Hillary Clinton 17 times. Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times. You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman? Apparently someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they've "purged" all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets. Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been "purged" of all information pertaining to Barsoomian. Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on behalf of the intelligence community. And, although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities. It's a cover, so big deal right? I mean what does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter? It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party's unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix .. and last but not least Mueller's never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians. Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention? Because...... She is (brace yourself for this....) Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's wife... That's why!! Jaw dropping, shocking and extremely sad that this info has never been exposed- This information is bullet proof and cannot be blown off by leftists ... and will convince many not paying attention that we have a soft coup happening now. WPT … (YAC) …
Bill e-mail a copy of this to Hanity, and FOX news in general. Then walk with you back to the wall at all times. Roger C.
Flake is the reincarnation of song bird McCain. He never did any thing of value while in congress. Now he wants national attention as a RINO a$$ hole. If he is thinking of a run for Pres. in 2020, is he going to run as a socialist or idoit, or just plain old wishy washy, (WILL YOU HAVE MY BABY, FLAKE) And he has the guts to judge Kavanaugh? He only had a 15% approval rating in AZ. that is why he is not running for reelection. He is getting his revenge on the citizens of the whole country for his own bad judgements. Roger C.
The Three Lies of Christine Blasey Ford By J.R. Dunn, October 2, 2018, American Thinker The great solon Richard Blumenthal, hero of An Loc, Ia Drang, Khe Sanh, Hue, and Tet, has explained to us that “Who lies in one instance, lies in all.” Blumenthal was referring to Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who hasn’t lied about anything, as far as anyone has been able to tell. But we can turn it around to focus on the party that Sen. Blumenthal was speaking out for. In how many instances has Christine Blasey Ford lied? Fear of Flying: Fear of flying is a commonplace among many travelers (so much so that Brian Eno in the 1970s recorded several hours of soothing music expressly designed to ease such fears). But in Blasey Ford’s case, it was presented as a terror so overwhelming, so uncontrollable, as to prevent her from traveling by air under any circumstances. No – Professordoktor Ford, we were led to believe, would need to drive from Palo Alto to Washington to testify before the Senate Judicial Committee. This claim fell apart in short order after it was revealed that Ford had lived for a year in Honolulu, a city effectively unreachable except by air, had vacationed in Tahiti and other areas of the Pacific, and regularly flew from California to the east coast to visit family. In light of all this, the “driving” claim became a running social media joke, with bogus reports of which was the last town she had driven through. The claim collapsed completely when it was revealed that she had flown out to D.C. to testify before the committee, evidently without aid of hypnotism, sedatives, oxygen tanks in case of hyperventilation, or a trained service animal. No one at the hearing bothered to question her about this discrepancy. They should have. The claim of a connection between Blasey Ford’s aviation phobia and Judge Kavanaugh is something of a mystery. Did he fly in to the infamous party in a Marine Corps Harrier VTOL jet? Or was he making jet plane noises as he was molesting young Christine? These questions, along with a multitude of others, remain open. Christine is a Psychologist: Blasey Ford allowed the public and the committee to believe that she was a psychologist in the full meaning of the term. She specifically told the committee that she was a “research psychologist”. She also made the claim on her university web site page, and in several other cases. The legacy media (for instance, the Washington Post and the Atlantic) dropped the “research’ part and repeatedly asserted that she was a licensed psychologist, with no request for a correction from the Blasey Ford camp. In fact, she is no such thing. While she has done the course work, and was awarded a doctorate in the field, she still lacks certification. To qualify as a “psychologist” in the state of California (and every other state in the union), an individual must serve a one-year residency and pass several rigorous examinations. Blasey Ford has not done so. She is, ipso facto, not a psychologist. Furthermore, she knows this. Her faculty page, which originally stated that she was a “research psychologist” has been scrubbed, and no longer makes that claim. Christine’s front door: Now we must deal with the comedy of the door. The door is a critical element in the Blasey Ford saga, acting as it did to disperse the fog of forgetfulness and enable her to confront the full truth of her ordeal in 1982… or maybe 1983. Simply put, her insistence in 2012 on a second front door led to friction in her marriage, which brought the Blasey Fords before a marriage counselor, at which point the professordoktor either did or did not first tell the tale of her suffering at the hands of Judge Kavanaugh. “In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Maryland. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.” (As is true of just about everything else in this story, the reasoning behind the second door remains a mystery. Evidently, its purpose was to allow Blasey Ford a means of escape if Kavanaugh landed his Harrier in front of her home and attempted to once again lay hands on her. The fact that a back or side door would serve this purpose much better has never, to my knowledge, entered the discussion.) Well, Christine got her door. But she didn’t get in 2012, and no marriage counselor was involved. It happens that the permit for remodeling her home – including adding the door -- was obtained in 2008. If Palo Alto is like other municipalities, the permit would be good for six months, with an option for a six-month extension. So the door must have been added at that time. And in fact, photographic evidence exists showing the new door in place in 2011, a year before Blasey Ford claims that it nearly destroyed her marriage. Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that the house in question was rented out by Blasey Ford to “Google interns” and that no one in her family lived there. In addition, somebody was running a business there (a “couples therapy” clinic, ironically enough – the “Couples Research Center.” There’s that word “research” again.), and that the door was added as an entrance to the business, rather than as a Kavanaugh-evasion device. While these claims might appear minor in isolation, together they form a pattern recognizable and undeniable. There will no doubt be others coming, but three is all we need, according to the wisdom of Auric Goldfinger: “Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.” A lot of print and commentary, both online and otherwise, has argued that Blasey Ford is credible, convincing, and sympathetic. Even her opponents hold that “something must have happened” to explain her behavior. But to believe this, we have to toss all standards of truth out the window. We have to postulate that a lie is not a lie, a liar is not a liar. We have to slip into a pure postmodern, nothing-is-certain, all-truth-is-relative mode. Without that, Blasey Ford is approximately as convincing as Julie Swetnick. She is not a sympathetic figure. She is not a confused, traumatized victim attempting to grapple with the fragmented memories of a past incident. The record clearly reveals that this to be nonsense. She is a malicious liar who has put herself at the service of malignant political clique for the purpose of undercutting the stated will and intentions of the people of this country. It is a simple fact that Kavanaugh’s accusers on the committee are proven liars – Feinstein in withholding the letter in the first place (not to mention denying how it became public), Booker concerning his good friend T-Bone, along with his “Spartacus moment”, Blumenthal concerning his heroism in Vietnam. The stunning irony here is that Judge Kavanaugh is demonstrably more honest than any of his accusers. This is the central truth of the Kavanaugh case. It must be hammered relentlessly, to the point where it can no longer be evaded. It must be repeated every time we’re told that “women don’t lie”. Every time someone flaunts a t-shirt reading “I Believe Her”. Every time we hear another obtuse blurt from Pelosi or Hirono. I must be repeated until it becomes the default, the meme that crowds everything else out: that the truth is not in Christine Blasey Ford, and that she is condemned by her own words. Case closed.
This Letter About Julie Swetnik is So Nuts It Needs to be Read BySteve Straub October 2, 2018at 3:31pm Share on Facebook TweetJulie Swetnikis so surreal it has to be seen to be believed: A man who says he had a relationship with Julie Swetnick in 1993 characterized her as psychologically troubled and possessing a “penchant” for group sex. Dennis Ketterer wrote this in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding her accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Ketterer said he is “not proud” of his relationship with Swetnick and had not previously disclosed it to his family or wife, but felt the need to inform the committee of his opinion of her allegations based on his experience with her. “I do not believe her allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh,” he wrote in the conclusion of the letter, dated Tuesday. Read the whole unbelievable thing: Whoa nelly…
This is a well written response to a person who believed Christine Ford: What you saw was a woman who claimed - perhaps truthfully, perhaps not - that she was assaulted. And, she claimed - perhaps truthfully, perhaps not - that the assailant was Judge Kavanagh. One of those two can be true without the other being true - she could have legitimately been assaulted, but not by Kavanaugh. Or, she may have been assaulted by Kavanaugh - that is not out of the realm of possibility, and that possibility was taken very seriously. However, no police report was ever filed. No doctors exam was ever performed. Four people she claimed could/would corroborate her story all failed to do so - with 2 of the 4 refuting the claim and saying that nothing like it ever happened to the best of their knowledge. This would not be the first time - even in recent history - that a political party has thrown wildly false allegations against a candidate in an effort to ruin their candidacy. And while it is certainly a bi-partisan problem (neither side is exempt), the Democrats have been far more aggressive in using such tactics in recent years. Therefore - on the one hand, you have the possibility that this was a real victim accusing her real assailant. Albeit 35 years later, with no mention of the assault to anyone, anyplace, until he became a federal judge in 2012, but still a real possibility. On the other hand, you have the possibility that this was an entirely fictional account, created by political operatives for the express purpose of preventing a conservative judge from being appointed to the Supreme Court. They are two extremes - but each represent a complete and total miscarriage of justice IF THE OTHER is actually true. So, you are left to look at the facts. Evidence. Corroborating witnesses. And, yes, behavior in the 35 years since the alleged assault. There is no evidence. None. If there ever was evidence, it is long since gone. There are *no* corroborating witnesses. Not a single one. Nobody who says, "Yes, I was there that night and I saw Kavanaugh assault her." Not even anyone who says, "Yes, I was best friends with her then and she was devastated by this entire ordeal." No police reports. Nothing at all to support her account except her word. Again - this does not disprove her claim. But there is absolutely nothing to support it. On the other side, you have a long line of people who know Kavanaugh and who say they have NEVER - not once - seen him behave in such a manner. Including, I might add, one of the four people the accuser says was in the room when the assault occurred. He has worked, closely, with women in a professional capacity every day of his life for the 35 years since, and not a SINGLE ONE of them came forward with a#MeToostory. Not one. The man has undergone six (and yes, that is a big number) separate "deep dive" FBI investigations. I've been through one of those investigations myself for work, and quite frankly I'd be surprised if the FBI hadn't spoken with YOU (personally) about me as a part of that investigation. I know of at least 300 people they spoke to, and a lot of those people didn't like me much back in the day. Yet, through the process of six deep dive, intensive background investigations by the FBI, NOBODY said anything about sexual misconduct. You're probably talking about close to 2000 close, personal associates, classmates, prior girlfriends, etc. that were interviewed. NONE of them said anything that supported these allegations. Again, that does not prove his innocence, either. But in a case of she-said, he-said? We've got is her accusing and him vehemently denying. And not a shred of evidence, nor a single corroborating witness, to support her recounting of events. But what we DO have is a spotless, six-times FBI investigated background that revealed nothing remotely similar to the behavior of which he was accused. In the absence of any evidence or corroborating witnesses, we cannot just convict the man in the court of public opinion because a woman - who is a lifelong Democrat and donates to the party regularly - comes out of the woodwork to make unsupported allegations against him. It might well be nothing but a political hit job, intended to destroy him and his candidacy, without any basis in reality whatsoever. Or, it could have been the truth. We will never know for sure. But we cannot convict on the basis of an unsupported, uncorroborated accusation. It is the Salem witch trials, or more recently the McCarthy red scare, all over again if we do. WPT … (YAC) …
